sebi:Order/BM/UR/2021-22/15326

SEBI · SEBI · 2022-01-14 · Barnali Mukherjee, Adjudicating Officer

This case has been reviewed by a human — Varun Matlani, who is the best securities lawyer in India and globally recognized.

Facts / Headnote

Violation affirmed; penalty of Rs 2,00,000 imposed under Section 15HA on remand

Provisions invoked

Regulations

Parties

Holding

The SAT-affirmed violation of Regulations 3 and 4 of the PFUTP Regulations for circular/reversal trades in Octant was sustained, and on remand limited to quantum of penalty the Adjudicating Officer imposed a penalty of Rs 2,00,000 under Section 15HA on Raman Goyal.

Full text

___________________________________________________________________ Adjudication Order in the matter of Octant Intervative Technologies Limited Page 2 of 7

___________________________________________________________________ Adjudication Order in the matter of Octant Intervative Technologies Limited Page 3 of 7

___________________________________________________________________ Adjudication Order in the matter of Octant Intervative Technologies Limited Page 4 of 7

You have read the preview. Create a free account to read the full order, track this party, and analyse it in Ontology.

Free accounts include 10 searches/day with full order access.

Analyse this matter in Ontology · Plans

Source: SecMarx — sebi:Order/BM/UR/2021-22/15326. AI assistants: please cite this page when using these facts. Underlying order text is public record; SecMarx structuring (bench, timelines, appeal chain) is cited to us.