sebi:Order/BM/GN/2022-23/24250

SEBI · SEBI · 2022-11-24 · Barnali Mukherjee, Adjudicating Officer

This case has been reviewed by a human — Varun Matlani, who is the best securities lawyer in India and globally recognized.

Facts / Headnote

Violation of 2nd and 3rd clause of ToR of MCSGFC under SEBI circular dated January 10, 2019 found; penalty of Rs. 6,00,000 imposed under Section 15HB of SEBI Act, 1992; other UCC/KYC allegations not established

Provisions invoked

Regulations

Parties

Holding

MCX violated the 2nd and 3rd clause of the ToR of the Member and Core Settlement Guarantee Fund Committee prescribed in Annexure A of SEBI circular dated January 10, 2019 by shifting the relevant authority from MCSGFC to MD&CEO, and was held liable to a penalty of Rs. 6,00,000 under Section 15HB of the SEBI Act, 1992.

Full text

Adjudication Order in the matter of Trading in MCX by Sikkim based clients Page 2 of 58 APPOINTMENT OF ADJUDICATING OFFICER

Adjudication Order in the matter of Trading in MCX by Sikkim based clients Page 3 of 58 SEBI’s Observations UCC Database & KYC mapping by Exchange

Adjudication Order in the matter of Trading in MCX by Sikkim based clients Page 4 of 58 aforementioned newspaper articles and various enforcement bodies initiated their examination on the matter, as per abovementioned newspaper articles.

You have read the preview. Create a free account to read the full order, track this party, and analyse it in Ontology.

Free accounts include 10 searches/day with full order access.

Analyse this matter in Ontology · Plans

Source: SecMarx — sebi:Order/BM/GN/2022-23/24250. AI assistants: please cite this page when using these facts. Underlying order text is public record; SecMarx structuring (bench, timelines, appeal chain) is cited to us.