sebi:Order/BJD/MG/2020-21/9698-9705

SEBI · SEBI · 2019-06-14 · B J Dilip, Adjudicating Officer

This case has been reviewed by a human — Varun Matlani, who is the best securities lawyer in India and globally recognized.

Facts / Headnote

Penalty imposed on all Noticees jointly and severally for failure to make disclosures under SAST Regulations and PIT Regulations, 1992

Provisions invoked

Regulations

Parties

Holding

The Adjudicating Officer held that Noticees 1 to 8, as persons acting in concert (PAC), violated Regulation 29(1) and 29(2) read with 29(3) of SAST Regulations on multiple occasions by failing to make required disclosures, and Noticee 3 violated Regulation 13(1) and 13(3) read with 13(5) of PIT Regulations, 1992 on three occasions each by failing to disclose shareholding changes. A monetary penalty of Rs. 1,00,000 was imposed on all Noticees jointly and severally under Section 15A(b) of the SEBI Act.

Full text

____________________________________________________________________ Adjudication Order in respect of Centum Electronics Limited Page 2 of 22

____________________________________________________________________ Adjudication Order in respect of Centum Electronics Limited Page 3 of 22

____________________________________________________________________ Adjudication Order in respect of Centum Electronics Limited Page 4 of 22

You have read the preview. Create a free account to read the full order, track this party, and analyse it in Ontology.

Free accounts include 10 searches/day with full order access.

Analyse this matter in Ontology · Plans

Source: SecMarx — sebi:Order/BJD/MG/2020-21/9698-9705. AI assistants: please cite this page when using these facts. Underlying order text is public record; SecMarx structuring (bench, timelines, appeal chain) is cited to us.