sebi:ORDER/BS/2021-22/13447

SEBI · SEBI · 2017-09-15 · Biju S., Adjudicating Officer

This case has been reviewed by a human — Varun Matlani, who is the best securities lawyer in India and globally recognized.

Facts / Headnote

Violation of Clause 41 of the Listing Agreement read with Sections 21 and 23E of the SCRA, 1956 established; quantum of penalty to be determined

Provisions invoked

Regulations

Parties

Holding

The Noticee (RIL) failed to disclose correct diluted EPS in its quarterly financial statements for six consecutive quarters from June 2007 to September 2008 despite the existence of share warrants, in violation of Clause 41 of the Listing Agreement read with Sections 21 and 23E of the SCRA, 1956.

Full text

Page 2 of 39 dated September 15, 2017 in the place of Shri S. V. Krishnamohan in the present matter. BRIEF FACTS OF THE CASE

Page 3 of 39 (hereinafter referred to as “Rules”) for the violations as specified in the SCN. 5. The Noticee submitted its reply to the SCN vide letter dated May 02, 2016, and following are the main submissions made therein –

Page 4 of 39 Quarter No. of equity shares outstanding during the quarter (in crore) Net profit during the period (Crore) No, of potential equity shares warrants outstanding during the period (in crore) Dilutive Potential Shares Number of Equity Shares Diluted EPS after providing for potential equity

You have read the preview. Create a free account to read the full order, track this party, and analyse it in Ontology.

Free accounts include 10 searches/day with full order access.

Analyse this matter in Ontology · Plans

Source: SecMarx — sebi:ORDER/BS/2021-22/13447. AI assistants: please cite this page when using these facts. Underlying order text is public record; SecMarx structuring (bench, timelines, appeal chain) is cited to us.