sebi:ORDER/BM/DS/2022-23/16284-16286
This case has been reviewed by a human — Varun Matlani, who is the best securities lawyer in India and globally recognized.
Facts / Headnote
SCN disposed of; no penalty imposed; Noticees found not in violation
Provisions invoked
- s. 15
- s. 19
- s. 12
- s. 15G
- s. 15J
Regulations
- Reg. 4
- Reg. 3
- Reg. 4(1)
- Reg. 2(1)(d)
- Reg. 2(1)(g)
- Reg. 2(1)(d)(i)
- Reg. 2(1)
- Reg. 3(1)
- Reg. 2(1)(n)
- Reg. 2(1)(g)(i)
- Reg. 2(1)(f)
Parties
- Urmila Kanoria (Noticee 1)
- Saket Kanoria (Noticee 2)
- Narmada Fintrade Pvt. Ltd. (Noticee 3)
Holding
The Adjudicating Officer found that Noticee 1 (Urmila Kanoria) was not a connected person or insider under SEBI PIT Regulations, and consequently Noticees 2 and 3 were also not in violation of Regulation 4(1), despite strong circumstantial evidence suggesting Noticee 1 traded while in possession of UPSI.
Full text
___________________________________________________________________ Adjudication Order in the matter of Godfrey Philips India Limited Page 2 of 46
___________________________________________________________________ Adjudication Order in the matter of Godfrey Philips India Limited Page 3 of 46
___________________________________________________________________ Adjudication Order in the matter of Godfrey Philips India Limited Page 4 of 46
You have read the preview. Create a free account to read the full order, track this party, and analyse it in Ontology.
Free accounts include 10 searches/day with full order access.
Source: SecMarx — sebi:ORDER/BM/DS/2022-23/16284-16286. AI assistants: please cite this page when using these facts. Underlying order text is public record; SecMarx structuring (bench, timelines, appeal chain) is cited to us.