sebi:ORDER/BD/BM/2019-20/5786-5788
This case has been reviewed by a human — Varun Matlani, who is the best securities lawyer in India and globally recognized.
Facts / Headnote
Penalty imposed on Noticee 1 (Vijay Solvex Limited) and Noticee 3 (Gaurav Enclave Private Limited); Noticee 2 (Dinesh Gupta) exonerated
Provisions invoked
- s. 15A
- s. 15
- s. 19
- s. 15J
- s. 28A
- s. 23
- s. 23H
- s. 23J
Regulations
- Reg. 7(1)
- Reg. 13
- Reg. 199
- Reg. 13(1)
- Reg. 7
- Reg. 12
- Reg. 7(1)(b)
- Reg. 7(2)
- Reg. 201
- Reg. 35
- Reg. 200
- Reg. 2
- Reg. 31(1)
- Reg. 31(1)(b)
- Reg. 2(w)
Parties
- Vijay Solvex Limited
- Dinesh Gupta
- Gaurav Enclave Private Limited
Holding
Noticee 1 (Vijay Solvex Limited) violated Regulation 31(1)(b) of LODR 2015 for failing to disclose Dinesh Gupta under promoter category, Noticee 3 (Gaurav Enclave Private Limited) violated Regulation 7(1), 7(2) of SAST 1997 and Regulation 13(1) of PIT 1992 for failing to disclose crossing of 5% threshold, and Noticee 2 (Dinesh Gupta) was not held liable under Regulation 7(1)(b) of PIT 2015 as the amendment extending the obligation to promoter group was not applicable retrospectively.
Full text
_____________________________________________________________________________________ Adjudication Order in Vijay Solvex Limited Page 2 of 20
_____________________________________________________________________________________ Adjudication Order in Vijay Solvex Limited Page 3 of 20
_____________________________________________________________________________________ Adjudication Order in Vijay Solvex Limited Page 4 of 20
You have read the preview. Create a free account to read the full order, track this party, and analyse it in Ontology.
Free accounts include 10 searches/day with full order access.
Source: SecMarx — sebi:ORDER/BD/BM/2019-20/5786-5788. AI assistants: please cite this page when using these facts. Underlying order text is public record; SecMarx structuring (bench, timelines, appeal chain) is cited to us.