sebi:ID3/JDIL/AO/DRK/ASG/EAD3-29/2009
This case has been reviewed by a human — Varun Matlani, who is the best securities lawyer in India and globally recognized.
Facts / Headnote
Penalty imposed on the noticee
Provisions invoked
- s. 15
- s. 15H
- s. 15J
Regulations
- Reg. 3
- Reg. 4(1)
- Reg. 31
Parties
- Hem Kanak Mercantile Pvt. Ltd.
Holding
The noticee, Hem Kanak Mercantile Pvt. Ltd., was found to have violated Regulations 4(1) and 4(2)(a), (b) and (e) of the PFUTP Regulations by executing synchronized/reversal/circular trades in the scrip of JDIL on BSE, and a penalty of Rs. 25,00,000 was imposed under Section 15HA of the SEBI Act.
Full text
Page - 2 - of 12 May 10, 2005 to Rs. 309.50 on September 02, 2005. BSE has also referred the matter for the considerations of SEBI vide its letter dated March 10, 2006.
Page - 3 - of 12 shares, which accounts for 42.15% of total volume traded during the period under investigation. Similarly, the same set of stock brokers sold 24,00,882 shares, which accounts for 41.86% of total volume traded during the period under investigation.
Page - 4 - of 12 of Fraudulent and Unfair Trade Practices relating to Securities Market) Regulations, 2003 (hereinafter referred to as the ‘PFUTP Regulations’) alleged to have been committed by the noticee.
You have read the preview. Create a free account to read the full order, track this party, and analyse it in Ontology.
Free accounts include 10 searches/day with full order access.
Source: SecMarx — sebi:ID3/JDIL/AO/DRK/ASG/EAD3-29/2009. AI assistants: please cite this page when using these facts. Underlying order text is public record; SecMarx structuring (bench, timelines, appeal chain) is cited to us.