sebi:EAD-3/JS/GSS/3575-3583/2019-20
This case has been reviewed by a human — Varun Matlani, who is the best securities lawyer in India and globally recognized.
Facts / Headnote
Penalty imposed on Noticees under Section 15H(ii) of the SEBI Act, 1992 for violation of regulation 3(2) read with regulation 13(1) of SEBI (SAST) Regulations, 2011
Provisions invoked
- s. 15A
- s. 15
- s. 15H
- s. 15I
- s. 15J
- s. 15F
- s. 433
- s. 31
Regulations
- Reg. 4
- Reg. 3
- Reg. 15
- Reg. 14
- Reg. 29(2)
- Reg. 30(2)
- Reg. 13(1)
- Reg. 201
- Reg. 3(2)
Parties
- Ajay Anand
- Sanjay Anand
- Instyle Investments Pvt. Ltd.
- Ajay Anand HUF
- Vishnu Anand
- Anand Rashmi
- Anadry Investments Private Limited
- Rohina Anand
- Mamata Finvest Private Limited
Holding
The Noticees violated regulation 3(2) read with regulation 13(1) of SEBI (SAST) Regulations, 2011 by failing to make a public announcement when promoter shareholding increased from 32.63% to 41.33% (an 8.7% increase exceeding the 5% threshold) through conversion of warrants, and a penalty of Rs. 10,00,000 was imposed on each Noticee under Section 15H(ii) of the SEBI Act, 1992.
Full text
Adjudication Order No. EAD-3/JS/GSS/3575-3583 /2019-20 Adjudication order in the matter of Faze three Ltd. || Page 2 of 10
Adjudication Order No. EAD-3/JS/GSS/3575-3583 /2019-20 Adjudication order in the matter of Faze three Ltd. || Page 3 of 10
Adjudication Order No. EAD-3/JS/GSS/3575-3583 /2019-20 Adjudication order in the matter of Faze three Ltd. || Page 4 of 10
You have read the preview. Create a free account to read the full order, track this party, and analyse it in Ontology.
Free accounts include 10 searches/day with full order access.
Source: SecMarx — sebi:EAD-3/JS/GSS/3575-3583/2019-20. AI assistants: please cite this page when using these facts. Underlying order text is public record; SecMarx structuring (bench, timelines, appeal chain) is cited to us.