sebi:EAD-2/SS/SK/2019-20/3655

SEBI · SEBI · Santosh Shukla, Adjudicating Officer

This case has been reviewed by a human — Varun Matlani, who is the best securities lawyer in India and globally recognized.

Facts / Headnote

Violation established; monetary penalty imposed

Provisions invoked

Regulations

Parties

Holding

The Noticee violated Regulations 3(a), (b), (c), (d), 4(1) and 4(2)(a) of the PFUTP Regulations by executing non-genuine reversal trades in illiquid BSE stock options and is liable under Section 15HA of the SEBI Act. A monetary penalty of Rs. 5,00,000 was imposed on the Noticee.

Full text

_______________________________________________________________________________ Adjudication order in respect of Assam Valley Finance and Investments Pvt Ltd in the matter of Illiquid Stock Options Page 2 of 12 (File Ref No.: EAD-2/SS/SK/25/48/2019-20)

_______________________________________________________________________________ Adjudication order in respect of Assam Valley Finance and Investments Pvt Ltd in the matter of Illiquid Stock Options Page 3 of 12 (File Ref No.: EAD-2/SS/SK/25/48/2019-20)

_______________________________________________________________________________ Adjudication order in respect of Assam Valley Finance and Investments Pvt Ltd in the matter of Illiquid Stock Options Page 4 of 12 (File Ref No.: EAD-2/SS/SK/25/48/2019-20)

You have read the preview. Create a free account to read the full order, track this party, and analyse it in Ontology.

Free accounts include 10 searches/day with full order access.

Analyse this matter in Ontology · Plans

Source: SecMarx — sebi:EAD-2/SS/SK/2019-20/3655. AI assistants: please cite this page when using these facts. Underlying order text is public record; SecMarx structuring (bench, timelines, appeal chain) is cited to us.