sebi:EAD-2/SS/SK/2018-19/1134

SEBI · SEBI · 2018-06-12 · Santosh Shukla, Adjudicating Officer

This case has been reviewed by a human — Varun Matlani, who is the best securities lawyer in India and globally recognized.

Facts / Headnote

SCN disposed of; no penalty imposed

Provisions invoked

Regulations

Parties

Holding

The Adjudicating Officer held that the charges against Lanha Enterprises under Clauses B(1), B(3), B(4), B(6), B(7) and B(8) of the Code of Conduct were not made out, and that the allegation of violation of the SEBI circular dated August 27, 2003 was vague and ambiguous. No monetary penalty was imposed and the SCN was disposed of.

Full text

_________________________________________________________________________________________ Adjudication Order in respect of Lanha Enterprises Page 2 of 6 (Ref No.: EAD-2/SS/SK/20/30/2018-19)

_________________________________________________________________________________________ Adjudication Order in respect of Lanha Enterprises Page 3 of 6 (Ref No.: EAD-2/SS/SK/20/30/2018-19)

_________________________________________________________________________________________ Adjudication Order in respect of Lanha Enterprises Page 4 of 6 (Ref No.: EAD-2/SS/SK/20/30/2018-19)

You have read the preview. Create a free account to read the full order, track this party, and analyse it in Ontology.

Free accounts include 10 searches/day with full order access.

Analyse this matter in Ontology · Plans

Source: SecMarx — sebi:EAD-2/SS/SK/2018-19/1134. AI assistants: please cite this page when using these facts. Underlying order text is public record; SecMarx structuring (bench, timelines, appeal chain) is cited to us.