sebi:EAD-2/DSR/KM/22-30/2013

SEBI · SEBI · 2013-08-29 · D. SURA REDDY, Adjudicating Officer

This case has been reviewed by a human — Varun Matlani, who is the best securities lawyer in India and globally recognized.

Facts / Headnote

Penalties imposed on all nine Noticees for contravention of PFUTP Regulations

Provisions invoked

Regulations

Parties

Holding

The Noticees violated Regulation 3(a), (b), (c), (d), 4(1), 4(2)(d) and (e) of the PFUTP Regulations by engaging in manipulative trades in the scrip of SAOL and are liable for penalty under Section 15HA of the SEBI Act.

Full text

Page 2 of 22 22.95 on February 02, 2009 to the high of ` 98 on July 08, 2009 and it closed at ` 31.45 on February 26, 2010.

Page 3 of 22 Imposing Penalties by Adjudicating Officer) Rules, 1995 (hereinafter referred to as “said Rules”) to inquire into and adjudge under Section 15HA of the SEBI Act, the alleged violation of the provisions of law by the Noticees. Show Cause Notice, Reply and Personal Hearing

Page 4 of 22 attend the said hearing and vide letter dated June 22, 2013 sought for an adjournment. Another opportunity of hearing was granted to the Noticees on September 19, 2013. Rajesh Kapoor appeared on the said date, reiterated the

You have read the preview. Create a free account to read the full order, track this party, and analyse it in Ontology.

Free accounts include 10 searches/day with full order access.

Analyse this matter in Ontology · Plans

Source: SecMarx — sebi:EAD-2/DSR/KM/22-30/2013. AI assistants: please cite this page when using these facts. Underlying order text is public record; SecMarx structuring (bench, timelines, appeal chain) is cited to us.