sebi:EAD-2/54/2012
This case has been reviewed by a human — Varun Matlani, who is the best securities lawyer in India and globally recognized.
Facts / Headnote
Charges not established; matter disposed of
Provisions invoked
- s. 15
- s. 21
- s. 23
- s. 23E
Parties
- Clutch Auto Ltd
Holding
The Adjudicating Officer concluded that the allegation of violation of Clause 22(c) of the Listing Agreement and Section 21 of the SCRA does not stand established, and the charges against the Noticee are not established.
Full text
Page 2 of 7 4. The Noticee had allegedly failed to send the requisite intimations to the stock exchange and SEBI has therefore initiated adjudication proceedings under the SEBI Act and the SCRA against the Noticee to inquire into and adjudge the alleged violations as above.
Page 3 of 7 b) Do the violations, if any, on the part of the Noticee attract any penalty under Section 15 HB of the SEBI Act or under Section 23E of the SCRA? c) If yes, what should be the quantum of monetary penalty?
Page 4 of 7 securities were considered. The partly paid shares were trading in the B- segment. Details of partly paid shares getting converted to fully paid up shares was sought from BSE (via email dated 22/09/2011). As per the email dated 23/11/2011 sent by Clutch Auto Ltd to BSE, it is gathered that the partly paid shares have been made fully paid up in the FY 1998-1999 after 30th June, 1998.
You have read the preview. Create a free account to read the full order, track this party, and analyse it in Ontology.
Free accounts include 10 searches/day with full order access.
Source: SecMarx — sebi:EAD-2/54/2012. AI assistants: please cite this page when using these facts. Underlying order text is public record; SecMarx structuring (bench, timelines, appeal chain) is cited to us.