sebi:EAD/SR/SJ/SO/12-13/2018-2019

SEBI · SEBI · 2013-04-08 · Sangeeta Rathod, Adjudicating Officer

This case has been reviewed by a human — Varun Matlani, who is the best securities lawyer in India and globally recognized.

Facts / Headnote

Adjudication proceedings disposed off on settlement upon payment of settlement charges

Provisions invoked

Regulations

Parties

Holding

The adjudication proceedings initiated against GMM Pfaudler Limited and Pfaudler Inc. vide SCN dated January 30, 2018 and supplementary SCN dated April 24, 2018 are disposed off on payment of Rs. 6,97,661 towards settlement charges in terms of regulation 15(1) of the Settlement Regulations, 2014.

Full text

Settlement Order in respect of GMM Pfaudler Limited and Pfaudler Inc. in the matter of GMM Pfaudler Limited Page 1 of 4 BEFORE THE ADJUDICATING OFFICER SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE BOARD OF INDIA SETTLEMENT ORDER (Application Nos. 3728/2018 and 3738/2018) On the applications submitted by GMM Pfaudler Limited and Pfaudler Inc. In the matter of GMM Pfaudler Limited Settlement Order No: EAD/SR/SJ/SO/12-13/2018-2019

Settlement Order in respect of GMM Pfaudler Limited and Pfaudler Inc. in the matter of GMM Pfaudler Limited Page 2 of 4 December 16, 2014. Therefore, it was alleged that the non-public shareholding was not brought down to 75% within the permitted time i.e. May 20, 2014. Therefore, it was alleged that: i. the Noticee 1 failed to maintain the MPS of 25% and therefore violated Clause 40A of Listing Agreement read with rule 19A of SCRR, 1957 and section 21 of Securities Contracts (Regulation) Act, 1956 (hereinafter referred to as ‘SCRA, 1956’) ii. the Noticee 2 along with other PACs failed to bring down the non-public shareholding to 75% within the time line i.e. by May 20, 2014 and there was delay in compliance of MPS requirement of 209 days. Therefore, the Noticee 2 violated Regulation 7(4) of SAST Regulations, 2011.

Settlement Order in respect of GMM Pfaudler Limited and Pfaudler Inc. in the matter of GMM Pfaudler Limited Page 3 of 4 and Noticee 2 failed to bring down the promoters’ shareholding to 75% and there was delay of 209 days in compliance of MPS requirement and therefore violated Regulation 7(4) of SAST Regulations, 2011.

You have read the preview. Create a free account to read the full order, track this party, and analyse it in Ontology.

Free accounts include 10 searches/day with full order access.

Analyse this matter in Ontology · Plans

Source: SecMarx — sebi:EAD/SR/SJ/SO/12-13/2018-2019. AI assistants: please cite this page when using these facts. Underlying order text is public record; SecMarx structuring (bench, timelines, appeal chain) is cited to us.