sebi:CO/26/TO/04/2003
This case has been reviewed by a human — Varun Matlani, who is the best securities lawyer in India and globally recognized.
Facts / Headnote
Application for exemption from public offer rejected; acquirer directed to make offer in accordance with SEBI (Delisting of Securities) Guidelines, 2003
Provisions invoked
- s. 4(3)
Regulations
- Reg. 4
- Reg. 21(3)
- Reg. 11(2)
- Reg. 20(5)
- Reg. 3(1)(l)
- Reg. 4(6)
- Reg. 20(3)
- Reg. 21(3)(a)
Holding
SEBI rejected the acquirers' application for exemption from making a public offer under Regulation 11(2) and directed them to make an offer to buy the outstanding public shares in accordance with the SEBI (Delisting of Securities) Guidelines, 2003.
Full text
outstanding shares aggregating to 1.82% of the total share capital of the Delco Remy Electricals India Limited(hereinafter referred to as the "Target company") remaining with the public shareholders. The shares of the Target company are listed at Mumbai & Hyderabad Stock Exchange.
Follow Us GST No. 27AAAJS1679K1ZL Terms & Conditions | Privacy Policy © SEBI All Rights Reserved - Website Owned and Managed by SEBI What's New | Contact Us | Feedback | Site Map | Website Policy | Guidelines for Data Sharing | My SEBI | FMC (Erstwhile) | SAT | Screen Reader Access | Investor Website | Useful Links | RTI Act, 2005 | Committees | Cause List | Tenders | Careers | Help | FAQs | Intermediaries | Statistics | The site is best viewed in Internet Explorer 11.0+, Firefox 24+ or Chrome 33+. Panel. They further submitted that the exemption sought by them, if granted would not set a precedent as it would be applicable to only those cases where exemption was granted prior to New Guidelines coming into effect. They further tried to justify their request by submitted that the open offer is being made @ Rs. 44.15/- even though the book value is less than Rs.5/- and therefore the promoters are willing to give this benefit to investors provided they are permitted to delist under the old procedure. They further submitted that the shareholders would not benefit from the process as contemplated in new Guidelines, as the floor price (for the book building process to be followed under new guidelines) would be book value of the share which is less than Rs. 5/-. They also submitted that the new de-listing process involves expenditure of Rs. 20 lakhs and moreover, entire process can be rendered infructuous by putting in frivolous bids.
5. Before proceeding further it is pertinent to note that whereas the first offer was proposed to be made @ Rs. 44.15/- per share ( being the price at which the preferential allotment was made to the acquirers within a period of 12 months prior to the date of the previous application in terms of Regulation 20(3) as existing prior to amendment to the Regulations notified on 9.9.02), the present offer was proposed to be made @ Rs. 10/- which was in terms of amended Regulation 20(5). When this was pointed out to the acquirers, they vide their letter dt. 03.02.03 proposed to revise the offer price upwards to Rs. 44.15/-. However, they requested that they may be allowed to de-list their securities under the old procedure for de-listing in terms of Takeover Regulations prior to the amendment dt. 09.09.02 and not under the SEBI (De-listing of Securities) Guidelines, 2003 (hereinafter referred to as "New Guidelines").
You have read the preview. Create a free account to read the full order, track this party, and analyse it in Ontology.
Free accounts include 10 searches/day with full order access.
Source: SecMarx — sebi:CO/26/TO/04/2003. AI assistants: please cite this page when using these facts. Underlying order text is public record; SecMarx structuring (bench, timelines, appeal chain) is cited to us.