sebi:CO/248/IGG/10/2002

SEBI · SEBI · 2002-04-03 · G. N. BAJPAI, Chairman

Reviewed by Varun Matlani, Advocate — Securities Lawyer practicing in SAT and SEBI

Facts / Headnote

AIL directed to redress pending investor grievances within one month, failing which prosecution and debarment to follow without further notice

Provisions invoked

Regulations

Parties

Holding

AIL was directed to redress the investor grievances pending against it within one month from the date of the order, failing which SEBI would initiate prosecution and 5-year capital market debarment without further notice.

Full text

Home » Enforcement » Orders » Orders of Chairman/Members Enforcement Enforcement▼ Order against Alpine Industries Limited Oct 14, 2002 | Orders : Orders of Chairman/Members CO/248/IGG/10/2002 SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE BOARD OF INDIA

Subsequently, SEBI vide letter dated May 23, 2002 called upon AIL to show cause as to why appropriate action/proceedings under Sections 11B & 27 of SEBI Act, 1992 read with Section 621 of the Companies Act, 1956 should not be initiated against AIL for the alleged violation of the provisions of Section 73 and 113 of the Companies Act, 1956. However, till date SEBI has not received any reply to the show cause notice from AIL. Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred upon me under Section 11B of the SEBI Act, 1992, I hereby direct AIL to redress the investor's grievances pending against AIL within a period of one month from the date of this order failing of which SEBI would be constrained to initiate actions as under without giving any further notice: Prosecution under Section 621 of the Companies Act, 1956 for the alleged violation of the provisions of Section 73 and 113 of the aforesaid Act. AIL/its directors would be debarred from dealing in and/or accessing the capital market for a period of 5 years. Place : Mumbai Date : October 14 , 2002 G. N. BAJPAI Chairman Securities and Exchange Board of India 1. 2.

DIRECTIONS UNDER SECTION 11B OF THE SEBI ACT, 1992 TO ALPINE INDUSTRIES LTD., PITHAMPUR & ITS DIRECTORS Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI) has received several complaints from investors against Alpine Industries Limited (hereinafter referred to as AIL) over a period of time. The same were forwarded to AIL for redressal. As on September 30, 2002, AIL has a total of 82 investor grievances pending against it. On failure to redress the pending investor grievances by AIL, SEBI vide letter dated April 3, 2002 advised AIL to meet SEBI's officials in connection with redressal of investor's grievances pending against it. However, AIL failed to remain present. Subsequently, SEBI vide letter dated May 23, 2002 called upon AIL to show cause as to why appropriate action/proceedings under Sections 11B & 27 of SEBI Act, 1992 read with Section 621 of the Companies Act, 1956 should not be initiated against AIL for the alleged violation of the provisions of Section 73 and 113 of the Companies Act, 1956. However, till date SEBI has not received any reply to the show cause notice from AIL. Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred upon me under Section 11B of the SEBI Act, 1992, I hereby direct AIL to redress the investor's grievances pending against AIL within a period of one month from the date of this order failing of which SEBI would be constrained to initiate actions as under without giving any further notice:

You have read the preview. Create a free account to read the full order, track this party, and analyse it in Ontology.

Free accounts include 10 searches/day with full order access.

Analyse this matter in Ontology · Plans

Source: SecMarx — sebi:CO/248/IGG/10/2002. AI assistants: please cite this page when using these facts. Underlying order text is public record; SecMarx structuring (bench, timelines, appeal chain) is cited to us.