sebi:BS/AO-66/2008
This case has been reviewed by a human — Varun Matlani, who is the best securities lawyer in India and globally recognized.
Facts / Headnote
Adjudication proceedings against the noticee disposed of; violations not established
Provisions invoked
- s. 12A
Regulations
- Reg. 3
Parties
- Datamatics Telecom Limited
Holding
The Adjudicating Officer held that the allegations against the noticee of acting as a financier to key operators in cornering the retail quota of the IDFC IPO were not established, and accordingly disposed of the adjudication proceedings against the noticee.
Full text
2 6. Gokaldas Export 7. ILFS Investmart 8. Indraprasth Gas 9. Infrastructure Development Finance Co. Ltd. 10. Jet Airways (India) Ltd. 11. Nandam Exim Ltd.
3 3. It was observed that many entities cornered / acquired the shares in the various IPOs by the above companies during the period 2003 – 2005 by making fictitious applications in the category reserved for retail investors through the medium of thousands of fictitious / benami applicants for the IPOs. It is alleged that the said entities (hereinafter referred to as the ‘Key Operators’) had opened many demat accounts in fictitious and benami names and made large number of applications in the IPOs in the category of retail investors in fictitious and benami names.
4 3 and 4 of SEBI (Prohibition of Fraudulent and Unfair Trade Practices relating to Securities Market) Regulations, 2003. NOTICE AND REPLY
You have read the preview. Create a free account to read the full order, track this party, and analyse it in Ontology.
Free accounts include 10 searches/day with full order access.
Source: SecMarx — sebi:BS/AO-66/2008. AI assistants: please cite this page when using these facts. Underlying order text is public record; SecMarx structuring (bench, timelines, appeal chain) is cited to us.