sebi:BM/AO-7/2013
This case has been reviewed by a human — Varun Matlani, who is the best securities lawyer in India and globally recognized.
Facts / Headnote
Proceeding disposed without penalty; violation not established
Provisions invoked
- s. 15A
- s. 15
- s. 15J
Regulations
- Reg. 13(6)
- Reg. 13(4)
Parties
- Prakash Industries Limited
Holding
Violation of Regulation 13(6) of the PIT Regulations does not stand established against Prakash Industries Limited, and the adjudication proceeding under Section 15A(b) of the SEBI Act is disposed of without imposition of penalty.
Full text
______________________________________________________________________________________ Prakash Industries Limited in the matter of Prakash Industries Limited Page 2 of 9 exchanges it was observed that no such disclosure was made by the Noticee and no such disclosures were available on the BSE and NSE websites. It was therefore alleged that Noticee did not make disclosure with respect to transactions of Vikram Agarwal as required under regulation 13(6) of PIT Regulations, 1992.
______________________________________________________________________________________ Prakash Industries Limited in the matter of Prakash Industries Limited Page 3 of 9 very difficult for us to ascertain as to how the same are not updated on their websites. c. Further, your goodself may kindly refer to the chart given in your above mentioned letter showing details of shares purchased and sold by Shri. Vikram Agarwal. As can be seen from the chart and also from the declaration submitted by us earlier, Shri Vikram Agarwal has not made any profits from the purchase and sale transactions in the shares. As such these transactions has no relation to the price of the scrip increasing from Rs.36 to Rs.281 as mentioned in para 2 of your above letter. We may further like to add here that the last transaction made by shi Vikram Agarwal was on 22nd October, 2007 on which date the price of the share was Rs. 126, as such major increase in the share price has happened subsequent to the date when Shri Vikram Agarwal has transacted in the scrip. It has been further informed that Shri Vikram Agarwal has not entered into any transaction of purchase of shares from the open market and purchases have been made from the promoter companies. d. In view of the fact mentioned in aforesaid paras, there was no reason on the part of the company for not having submitted th
______________________________________________________________________________________ Prakash Industries Limited in the matter of Prakash Industries Limited Page 4 of 9 from them. Hence, Noticee sought for 15 days time to submit the required information. Vide email dated December 17, 2012 Noticee was advised to submit the said information by December 28, 2012. Noticee was further informed that if they failed to submit the information on time the matter shall be proceeded on the basis of material available on record. Vide letter dated December 28, 2012 Noticee made the following submission:
You have read the preview. Create a free account to read the full order, track this party, and analyse it in Ontology.
Free accounts include 10 searches/day with full order access.
Source: SecMarx — sebi:BM/AO-7/2013. AI assistants: please cite this page when using these facts. Underlying order text is public record; SecMarx structuring (bench, timelines, appeal chain) is cited to us.