sebi:BM/AO-4/2010
This case has been reviewed by a human — Varun Matlani, who is the best securities lawyer in India and globally recognized.
Facts / Headnote
Noticee found guilty and penalty of Rs. 8,00,000 imposed under Section 15HA
Provisions invoked
- s. 15
- s. 15H
- s. 15J
Regulations
- Reg. 3
- Reg. 4
- Reg. 4(1)
- Reg. 200
Parties
- Shri Dadia Devang
Holding
The Noticee violated regulations 4(1), 4(2)(a), 4(2)(b), 4(2)(g) and 4(2)(n) of PFUTP Regulations, 2003 by executing synchronized/structured and circular/reversal trades in nine scrips creating artificial volumes, and is liable to monetary penalty under Section 15HA of SEBI Act.
Full text
Page 2 of 16 synchronization of deals/circular trading in the shares of these Scrips in such a manner that led to creation of artificial volumes.
Page 3 of 16 SHOW CAUSE NOTICE, HEARING AND REPLY 7. Show Cause Notice No. EAD-5/VSS/RK/126140/2008 dated May 21, 2008 (hereinafter referred to as “SCN”) was issued to the Noticee under rule 4(1) of the Rules to show cause as to why an inquiry should not be held against the Noticee and penalty be not imposed on the Noticee under sections 15HA of SEBI Act for the alleged violation specified in the said SCN.
Page 4 of 16 10. It is observed from the records that the SCN was hand delivered to the Noticee, but the Noticee has not replied to the said SCN.
You have read the preview. Create a free account to read the full order, track this party, and analyse it in Ontology.
Free accounts include 10 searches/day with full order access.
Source: SecMarx — sebi:BM/AO-4/2010. AI assistants: please cite this page when using these facts. Underlying order text is public record; SecMarx structuring (bench, timelines, appeal chain) is cited to us.