sebi:BM/AO-36/2012
This case has been reviewed by a human — Varun Matlani, who is the best securities lawyer in India and globally recognized.
Facts / Headnote
Penalty imposed on the Noticee for non-compliance with SEBI order
Provisions invoked
- s. 15
- s. 15H
- s. 15J
Parties
- Noticee
Holding
The Noticee contravened the directions of the Board contained in the SEBI order dated April 23, 2009 by trading in the scrip of RPL after being restrained from doing so, and a penalty of Rs. 2,00,000/- was imposed under section 15HB of the SEBI Act.
Full text
Page 2 of 5 alleged that the Noticee had traded despite being restrained from doing so which was in violation of the aforesaid SEBI order.
Page 3 of 5 CONSIDERATION OF ISSUES AND FINDINGS 7. I have carefully examined the SCN, the submissions made by the Noticee and the documents available on record. The allegations against the Noticee are as follows: i. The Noticee traded in the scrip of RPL even after SEBI had restrained the Noticee among others from trading in the securities market.
Page 4 of 5 (iv) The Noticee admitted to the placing of the sell order for 500 shares of RPL even after receiving the SEBI order. However, he submitted that his non- compliance was not intentional but a mistake. I have considered the submission by the Noticee. Admitting the fault, does not absolve him from the violation of non-compliance of SEBI order.
You have read the preview. Create a free account to read the full order, track this party, and analyse it in Ontology.
Free accounts include 10 searches/day with full order access.
Source: SecMarx — sebi:BM/AO-36/2012. AI assistants: please cite this page when using these facts. Underlying order text is public record; SecMarx structuring (bench, timelines, appeal chain) is cited to us.