sebi:BM/AO-118/2010
Facts / Headnote
Proceedings disposed without imposition of penalty under Section 15HA of SEBI Act
Provisions invoked
- s. 15
- s. 15H
- s. 15J
Regulations relied on
- SEBI (PFUTP) Regulations, 2003 — 3(a)
- SEBI (PFUTP) Regulations, 2003 — 3(b)
- SEBI (PFUTP) Regulations, 2003 — 3(c)
- SEBI (PFUTP) Regulations, 2003 — 3(d)
- SEBI (PFUTP) Regulations, 2003 — 4(1)
Parties
- Vikram Singh Rajput
Holding
The allegations of violation of regulations 3(a), (b), (c), (d) and 4(1) of PFUTP by Vikram Singh Rajput were not established and the matter was held not fit for imposition of penalty under Section 15HA of SEBI Act, and the proceedings were disposed accordingly.
Full text
Page 2 of 10 lowest volume on July 01, 2005, when only one share was traded and highest being on August 26, 2005 when 1,36,70,180 shares were traded.
Page 3 of 10 3. It was observed from the investigation that one of the entities, Vikram Singh Rajput, (hereinafter referred to as “Noticee”) received shares in the offmarket from other entities. These shares were again transferred to the same entities which were offloaded in the market and allegedly created volume in the market. In view of the above it was alleged that the Noticee violated regulations 3(a), (b), (c), (d) and 4 (1) of SEBI (Prohibition of Fraudulent and Unfair Trade Practices Relating to Securities Markets) Regulations, 2003 (hereinafter referred to as “PFUTP”) and consequently, liable for monetary
Page 4 of 10 should not be held and penalty be not imposed under section 15HA of SEBI Act for the alleged violation specified in the said SCN.
You have read the preview. Create a free account to read the full order, track this party, and analyse it in Ontology.
Free accounts include 10 searches/day with full order access.
Source: SecMarx — sebi:BM/AO-118/2010. AI assistants: please cite this page when using these facts. Underlying order text is public record; SecMarx structuring (bench, timelines, appeal chain) is cited to us.