sebi:BM/AO/62/2011
This case has been reviewed by a human — Varun Matlani, who is the best securities lawyer in India and globally recognized.
Facts / Headnote
Noticee found guilty of violating Regulations 4(1), 4(2)(a), 4(2)(b) and 4(2)(g) of PFUTP Regulations; not guilty under Regulation 4(2)(n); penalty of Rs 2,50,000 under Section 15HA imposed
Provisions invoked
- s. 15
- s. 15H
- s. 15J
Regulations
- Reg. 3
- Reg. 4
- Reg. 4(1)
- Reg. 200
- Reg. 4(2)(n)
Parties
- Narendra Nath
Holding
The Noticee, trading through M/s. Mansukh Securities P. Ltd. in Aarti Drugs Ltd and Havells India Ltd, was held guilty of synchronized/structured and circular/reversal trades violating Regulations 4(1), 4(2)(a), (b) and (g) of PFUTP Regulations, 2003, but not Regulation 4(2)(n). A monetary penalty of Rs 2,50,000 under Section 15HA of SEBI Act was imposed.
Full text
Page 2 of 19 3. It was alleged that one of the clients, Mr. Narendra Nath (hereinafter referred to as “Noticee) trading through M/s. Mansukh Securities P. Ltd., broker, National Stock Exchange of India Ltd (hereinafter referred to as ‘NSE’) in the scrip of Aarti Drugs Ltd and Havells India Ltd executed synchronized/structured and circular trades and violated provisions of regulations 4(1), 4(2)(a), 4(2)(b), 4(2)(g) and 4(2)(n) of SEBI (Prohibition of Fraudulent and Unfair Trade Practices Relating to Securities Markets) Regulations, 2003 (hereinafter referred to as “PFUTP Regulations”). Consequently the Noticee was liable for monetary
Page 3 of 19 7. It was alleged in the SCN that the Noticee, through Mr, Mansukh Securities P. Ltd., had executed structured/synchronized and circular trades in the Scrip of Aarti Drugs Ltd and Havells India Ltd.
Page 4 of 19 that is E-3/16, Modle Town, 1st Delhi -110009 and requested to send the file / documents on the said new address so that he could submit his reply. The Noticee also informed that due to his health condition he is unable to appear for the hearing granted to him on February 22, 2011. The copy of the SCN bearing reference no. EAD-5/VSS/RK/156322/2009 along with the enclosure was again sent to the Noticee vide letter dated February 21, 2011 at his new address and the said letter dated was duly acknowledged by the Noticee.
You have read the preview. Create a free account to read the full order, track this party, and analyse it in Ontology.
Free accounts include 10 searches/day with full order access.
Source: SecMarx — sebi:BM/AO/62/2011. AI assistants: please cite this page when using these facts. Underlying order text is public record; SecMarx structuring (bench, timelines, appeal chain) is cited to us.