sebi:ASK/AO/SPV/21-26/2015-16

SEBI · SEBI · 2014-07-21 · A Sunil Kumar, Adjudicating Officer

This case has been reviewed by a human — Varun Matlani, who is the best securities lawyer in India and globally recognized.

Facts / Headnote

Penalty imposed on Noticees for violations of SAST Regulations and PIT Regulations

Provisions invoked

Regulations

Parties

Holding

The Noticees violated Regulation 7(1A) of SAST Regulations by failing to disclose share sales aggregating 2% or more on 15 occasions, and Noticee No. 6 violated Regulation 13(3) of PIT Regulations by failing to disclose change in shareholding exceeding 2% upon invocation of pledge. Penalty of Rs. 30,00,000/- jointly and severally on Noticees 1-6 for SAST violation and Rs. 5,00,000/- on Noticee No. 6 for PIT violation was imposed.

Full text

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Adjudication Order with respect to the promoters of M/s Austral Coke and Projects Limited. Page 2 of 17 May 05, 2015

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Adjudication Order with respect to the promoters of M/s Austral Coke and Projects Limited. Page 3 of 17 May 05, 2015

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Adjudication Order with respect to the promoters of M/s Austral Coke and Projects Limited. Page 4 of 17 May 05, 2015

You have read the preview. Create a free account to read the full order, track this party, and analyse it in Ontology.

Free accounts include 10 searches/day with full order access.

Analyse this matter in Ontology · Plans

Source: SecMarx — sebi:ASK/AO/SPV/21-26/2015-16. AI assistants: please cite this page when using these facts. Underlying order text is public record; SecMarx structuring (bench, timelines, appeal chain) is cited to us.