sebi:AO/SG-VS/EAD/66/2017
This case has been reviewed by a human — Varun Matlani, who is the best securities lawyer in India and globally recognized.
Facts / Headnote
Penalty imposed
Provisions invoked
- s. 15A
- s. 15
- s. 15J
Regulations
- Reg. 8(3)
- Reg. 6(4)
- Reg. 35
Parties
- AF Enterprises Limited
Holding
The Noticee violated Regulation 6(4) of SAST Regulations, 1997 for the year 1997 and Regulation 8(3) of SAST Regulations, 1997 for the years 1998 to 2009, and is liable for a consolidated penalty of Rs. 4,70,000 under Section 15A(b) of the SEBI Act.
Full text
Adjudication Order in respect of AF Enterprises Limited. Page 2 of 14 5 8(3) 30.04.2001 28.04.2010 3285 6 8(3) 30.04.2002 28.04.2010 2920 7 8(3) 30.04.2003 28.04.2010 2555 8 8(3) 30.04.2004 28.04.2010 2189 9 8(3) 30.04.2005 28.04.2010 1824 10 8(3) 30.04.2006 28.04.2010 1459 11 8(3) 30.04.2007 28.04.2010 1094 12 8(3) 30.04.2008 28.04.2010 728 13 8(3) 30.04.2009 28.04.2010 363
Adjudication Order in respect of AF Enterprises Limited. Page 3 of 14 and penalty be not imposed under Section 15A(b) of SEBI Act. It is noted that the aforesaid SCN was issued to the Noticee at “241, 2nd Floor, RG Mall, Opposite Plot no. 39, SEC-9, Rohini, New Delhi - 110085” and the said SCN was returned undelivered.
Adjudication Order in respect of AF Enterprises Limited. Page 4 of 14 9. In view of the aforesaid submission by the Noticee, another hearing notice dated August 12, 2016 was issued on the Noticee through speed post AD, advising the Noticee to submit a reply to the SCN on or before August 29, 2016 and appear for hearing on September 02, 2016 at SEBI, Head Office, Mumbai.
You have read the preview. Create a free account to read the full order, track this party, and analyse it in Ontology.
Free accounts include 10 searches/day with full order access.
Source: SecMarx — sebi:AO/SG-VS/EAD/66/2017. AI assistants: please cite this page when using these facts. Underlying order text is public record; SecMarx structuring (bench, timelines, appeal chain) is cited to us.