sebi:AO/JS/VRP/23-28/2017

SEBI · SEBI · 2016-09-22 · Jeevan Sonparote, Adjudicating Officer

Reviewed by Varun Matlani, Advocate — Securities Lawyer practicing in SAT and SEBI

Facts / Headnote

Disposed off - allegations not established, no penalty imposed

Provisions invoked

Regulations relied on

Parties

Holding

The Adjudicating Officer held that the six Noticees had not violated Regulations 3(a), (b), (c), (d), 4(1) and 4(2)(a) and (g) of the PFUTP Regulations by executing self-trades, and consequently no monetary penalty under Section 15HA of the SEBI Act was imposed; the adjudication proceedings were disposed off.

Full text

___________________________________________________________________________ Adjudication Order in the matter of Midfield Industries Limited Page 2 of 8

___________________________________________________________________________ Adjudication Order in the matter of Midfield Industries Limited Page 3 of 8

___________________________________________________________________________ Adjudication Order in the matter of Midfield Industries Limited Page 4 of 8

You have read the preview. Create a free account to read the full order, track this party, and analyse it in Ontology.

Free accounts include 10 searches/day with full order access.

Analyse this matter in Ontology · Plans

Source: SecMarx — sebi:AO/JS/VRP/23-28/2017. AI assistants: please cite this page when using these facts. Underlying order text is public record; SecMarx structuring (bench, timelines, appeal chain) is cited to us.