sebi:AO/BJD/MAS/EAD/67-68/2017

SEBI · SEBI · 2016-06-04 · B J DILIP, Adjudicating Officer

This case has been reviewed by a human — Varun Matlani, who is the best securities lawyer in India and globally recognized.

Facts / Headnote

Adjudication proceedings disposed of without any penalty; allegations against both Noticees not established

Provisions invoked

Regulations

Parties

Holding

The Adjudicating Officer held that allegations against Noticee 1 (Alfa Fiscal Services Pvt. Ltd.) of violating PFUTP Regulations by self-trades, and against Noticee 2 (ANS Pvt. Ltd.) of violating broker due diligence norms, did not stand established, and the proceedings were disposed of without any penalty.

Full text

Page 2 of 14 was any violation of the provisions of SEBI Act, 1992 and various Rules and Regulations and Guidelines made there under.

Page 3 of 14 consequent to an inter- departmental transfer and postings, the said proceedings were transferred to the undersigned vide order dated May 16, 2017. SHOW CAUSE NOTICE, REPLY AND PERSONAL HEARING

Page 4 of 14 Conduct for stock brokers as specified under Schedule II read with Regulation 7 of SEBI (Stock Brokers and Sub- Brokers) Regulations, 1992. REPLY TO THE SCN

You have read the preview. Create a free account to read the full order, track this party, and analyse it in Ontology.

Free accounts include 10 searches/day with full order access.

Analyse this matter in Ontology · Plans

Source: SecMarx — sebi:AO/BJD/MAS/EAD/67-68/2017. AI assistants: please cite this page when using these facts. Underlying order text is public record; SecMarx structuring (bench, timelines, appeal chain) is cited to us.