sebi:8140/24/9

SEBI · SEBI · 2002-11-27 · V. K. CHOPRA, WHOLE TIME MEMBER

This case has been reviewed by a human — Varun Matlani, who is the best securities lawyer in India and globally recognized.

Facts / Headnote

Minor penalty of suspension of certificate of registration for a period of 7 days imposed on M/s JVS Securities (P) Ltd.

Provisions invoked

Regulations

Parties

Holding

The Broker, M/s JVS Securities (P) Ltd., was found to have violated Regulation 4(b) and (c) of the PFUTP Regulations and Regulation 7 read with clause A(3) and (4) of the Code of Conduct under the Stock Brokers Regulations by executing 36 synchronized trades in Ranbaxy shares. A minor penalty of 7-day suspension of registration was imposed (as against the 6-month suspension recommended by the Enquiry Officer).

Full text

APPEARANCES: FOR COMPANIES/ BROKERS: Mr. Somasekhar Sundaresan, Advocate, J.Sagar & Associates Mr. Jyoti Vardhan Sonthalia, Director, M/s JVS Securities (P) Ltd FOR SEBI Mrs Barnali Mukherjee, DGM, SEBI

price of the Ranbaxy scrip from Rs.270/- in January 1999 to about Rs.1200/- in October 1999 accompanied with significant increase in volumes traded in the Exchanges particularly on the Stock Exchange, Mumbai (BSE), National Stock Exchange (NSE) and Calcutta Stock Exchange (CSE). 1.2 The Board after considering the Investigation Report, appointed an Enquiry Officer vide Order dated November 27, 2002 to enquire into the violations allegedly committed by the Broker under the provisions of Regulation 4(a), (b), (c) and (d) of SEBI (Prohibition of Fraudulent and Unfair Trade Practices relating to Securities Markets) Regulations, 1995 (hereinafter referred to in short as “PFUTP Regulations”) Regulation 7 of the SEBI (Stock Brokers & Sub-Brokers) Regulations, 1992 read with clause A(3) and (4) of Schedule II of the Code of Conduct for Stock Brokers issued under SEBI (Stock Brokers & Sub-Brokers) Regulations, 1992 (hereinafter referred to in short as “Stock Brokers Regulations”) and Rules, Regulations and Bye-laws of Stock Exchanges. 1.3 The Enquiry Officer, after conducting an enquiry in accordance with the provisions of Regulation 6 of the Securities and Exchange Board of India (Procedure for holding Enquiry by Enquiry Officer and imposing penalty) Regulations, 2002 submitted a report dated November 27, 2003 whereby he observed that the Broker violated the provisions of SEBI circular No.SMDRP/POLICY/CIR-32/1999 dated September 14, 1999; Regulation 7 read with clause A(3) and (4) of

2.0 SHOW CAUSE NOTICE 2.1 Pursuant to the receipt of the said Enquiry Report, a Show Cause Notice dated April 28, 2004 was issued to the Broker, along with a copy of the said Enquiry Report, advising the Broker to show cause as to why the action, as recommended by the Enquiry Officer or any other penalty deemed appropriate should not be imposed on it. The Broker submitted its reply to the said show cause notice, vide letter dated May 19, 2004. 3.0 REPLY OF THE BROKER 3.1 The Broker stated that 17 out of a total of 36 transactions (2,75,000 shares) took place prior to September 14, 1999, the date on which SEBI issued its circular prohibiting negotiated deals. 3.2 The Broker stated that the Enquiry Officer has failed to show how in the case of thirty six transactions, an allegation of synchronized trades can be levelled merely because the purchase order and a sale order happens to be entered at around the same time for the same price and that too in a screen based trading mechanism of the stock exchange. 3.3 The Broker stated that the Enquiry Officer has failed to show the basis of his finding that prices and quantities had been negotiated outside the system. The Broker stated that there is no rationale behind such a purported finding of the Enquiry Officer that out of 6,39,873 shares, 3,65,900 shares were matched with brokers associated with Ketan Parekh Group. They have also added that there is not even allegation in the Enquiry Report about any linkage between the Broker and

You have read the preview. Create a free account to read the full order, track this party, and analyse it in Ontology.

Free accounts include 10 searches/day with full order access.

Analyse this matter in Ontology · Plans

Source: SecMarx — sebi:8140/24/9. AI assistants: please cite this page when using these facts. Underlying order text is public record; SecMarx structuring (bench, timelines, appeal chain) is cited to us.