sebi:10654
This case has been reviewed by a human — Varun Matlani, who is the best securities lawyer in India and globally recognized.
Facts / Headnote
Warning issued to the sub-broker
Provisions invoked
- s. 19
Regulations
- Reg. 13(4)
- Reg. 5
- Reg. 200
Parties
- Shri Mansukhlal Jagabhai Tanti
Holding
SEBI warned Shri Mansukhlal Jagabhai Tanti, a sub-broker affiliated to M/s. SKSE Securities Ltd., to be careful in future dealings in the securities market and to diligently adhere to the provisions of the SEBI Act, 1992, and the Regulations and Circulars made thereunder.
Full text
Whereas, Securities and Exchange Board of India ( hereinafter referred to as SEBI ) conducted an inspection of the books of accounts and other documents of Shri Mansukhlal Jagabhai Tanti, a sub broker affiliated to M/s. SKSE Securities Ltd., Member-The Stock Exchange, Mumbai (hereinafter referred to as “sub-broker”) into the alleged violations of the provisions of Securities and Exchange Board of India Act, 1992 (hereinafter referred to as SEBI Act), Rules, Regulations and Circulars made there under. The inspection revealed various irregularities and violations to have been committed by the sub broker including those of irregularities in issuance of confirmation memos; deficiencies in the maintenance of clients’ agreements & registration forms, non opening of separate clients’ bank accounts, delay in payment of funds & delivery of securities to clients’, maintaining running accounts without obtaining consent letter from the clients’ and acceptance of cash from the clients’; and Whereas vide order dated January 07, 2004 an Enquiry Officer was thus appointed by SEBI under Regulation 5 of SEBI (Procedure for holding enquiry by Enquiry Officer and Imposing Penalty) Regulations, 2002 (hereinafter referred to as ‘Enquiry Regulations’) to enquire into the alleged contravention of SEBI Act, SEBI (Stock Brokers & Sub-Brokers) Regulations, 1992 (hereinafter referred to as Broker Regulations), SEBI (Stock Brokers & Sub-Brokers) Rules, 1992 (hereinafter referred to as Broker Rules), SEBI
whereas, the sub broker did not reply to the said show cause notice inspite of its receipt and therefore I am proceeding in the matter on the basis of the material available on record; and whereas, from the reply given by the sub broker to the Enquiry Officer and also during the hearing before the Enquiry Officer, I note that the sub broker has submitted that he has rectified all the deficiencies which has also been conceded by the Enquiry Officer; and whereas, it is observed that the enquiry officer having considered these
MADHUKAR WHOLE TIME MEMBER SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE BOARD OF INDIA
You have read the preview. Create a free account to read the full order, track this party, and analyse it in Ontology.
Free accounts include 10 searches/day with full order access.
Source: SecMarx — sebi:10654. AI assistants: please cite this page when using these facts. Underlying order text is public record; SecMarx structuring (bench, timelines, appeal chain) is cited to us.