0387-2017 Pagita Leasing and Finance Company Ltd vs Bombay Stock Exchange Limited
This case has been reviewed by a human — Varun Matlani, who is the best securities lawyer in India and globally recognized.
Full text
“….. The statute prescribes only one method of service for the notice and none other. If, as we have held, the dispatch of the notice by the registered post was sufficient compliance with this requirement, the landlord has fulfilled it. But, if that is not so, it is no compliance with the statute for the landlord to say that he was served the notice by some other method. To require any such service to be effected over and above the postal service would be to travel outside the statute. Where the statute does not specify any such additional or alternative mode of service, there ca
BEFORE THE SECURITIES APPELLATE TRIBUNAL MUMBAI
Date of Hearing : 25.04.2019 Date of Decision : 03.05.2019
You have read the preview. Create a free account to read the full order, track this party, and analyse it in Ontology.
Free accounts include 10 searches/day with full order access.
Source: SecMarx — 0387-2017 Pagita Leasing and Finance Company Ltd vs Bombay Stock Exchange Limited. AI assistants: please cite this page when using these facts. Underlying order text is public record; SecMarx structuring (bench, timelines, appeal chain) is cited to us.