0068-2011 M-s. Mansukh Securities and Finance Ltd vs The Adjudicating Officer, Securities and Exchange Board of India

SAT · Final order

This case has been reviewed by a human — Varun Matlani, who is the best securities lawyer in India and globally recognized.

Full text

“It must be remembered that the purpose of carrying out inspection is not punitive and the object is to make the intermediary comply with the procedural requirements in regard to the maintenance of records. We also cannot lose sight of the fact that every minor discrepancy/irregularity found during the course of inspection is not culpable and the object of the inspection could well be achieved by pointing out the irregularities/deficiencies to the intermediary at the time of inspection and making it compliant. This will, of course, depend on the nature of the irregularity notic

BEFORE THE SECURITIES APPELLATE TRIBUNAL

MUMBAI

You have read the preview. Create a free account to read the full order, track this party, and analyse it in Ontology.

Free accounts include 10 searches/day with full order access.

Analyse this matter in Ontology · Plans

Source: SecMarx — 0068-2011 M-s. Mansukh Securities and Finance Ltd vs The Adjudicating Officer, Securities and Exchange Board of India. AI assistants: please cite this page when using these facts. Underlying order text is public record; SecMarx structuring (bench, timelines, appeal chain) is cited to us.