0473-2021 Pia Johnson and Anr and Another vs SEBI

SAT · Final order

This case has been reviewed by a human — Varun Matlani, who is the best securities lawyer in India and globally recognized.

Full text

were in place to ensure that these regulations are not violated and no unpublished price sensitive information was communicated by the individuals possessing the information to the individuals taking trading decisions and there is no evidence of such arrangements having been breached; (vi) the trades were pursuant to a trading plan set up in accordance with regulation 5. NOTE: When a person who has traded in securities has been in possession of unpublished price sensitive information, his trades would be presumed to have been motivated by the knowledge and awareness of s

BEFORE THE SECURITIES APPELLATE TRIBUNAL

MUMBAI Order Reserved on: 03.03.2022

You have read the preview. Create a free account to read the full order, track this party, and analyse it in Ontology.

Free accounts include 10 searches/day with full order access.

Analyse this matter in Ontology · Plans

Source: SecMarx — 0473-2021 Pia Johnson and Anr and Another vs SEBI. AI assistants: please cite this page when using these facts. Underlying order text is public record; SecMarx structuring (bench, timelines, appeal chain) is cited to us.