0385-2016 Anupam D. Dighe HUF vs Securities and Exchange Board of India
This case has been reviewed by a human — Varun Matlani, who is the best securities lawyer in India and globally recognized.
Full text
BEFORE THE SECURITIES APPELLATE TRIBUNAL
MUMBAI
Date : 24/11/2016 Misc. Application No.314 of 2016 And Appeal No.385 of 2016 Anupam D. Dighe (HUF) 3/207, Mehta Park, Bhagoji Keer Road, Mahim, Mumbai – 400 016. … Appellant Versus Securities and Exchange Board of India SEBI Bhavan, Plot No.C-4A, G-Block, Bandra-Kurla Complex, Bandra (East), Mumbai – 400 051. … Respondent Mr. Vishal Jathar, Advocate i/b India Law Alliance for the Appellant and the Appellant in person. Mr. Pradeep Sancheti, Senior Advocate a/w Mr. Pulkit Sukhramani, Advocate i/b The Law Point for the Respondent. CORAM : Justice J.P. Devadhar, Presiding Officer Jog Singh, Member Dr. C.K.G. Nair, Member Per : Justice J.P. Devadhar (Oral) 1. Basic grievance of the appellant is that complaints filed by the appellant
You have read the preview. Create a free account to read the full order, track this party, and analyse it in Ontology.
Free accounts include 10 searches/day with full order access.
Source: SecMarx — 0385-2016 Anupam D. Dighe HUF vs Securities and Exchange Board of India. AI assistants: please cite this page when using these facts. Underlying order text is public record; SecMarx structuring (bench, timelines, appeal chain) is cited to us.