0113-2015 Bhavesh Jain and Another vs Securities and Exchange Board of India
This case has been reviewed by a human — Varun Matlani, who is the best securities lawyer in India and globally recognized.
Full text
“17. I find that though the initial trades look like non- structured trades due to difference in order quantities or order, the orders were perfectly matched in sequence of two orders or in multiple orders. This mechanism was clearly adopted to avoid detection of the structured trades. The above synchronized trades were cleverly executed to look like non-structured trades but the above type of matching is only possible when there is a meeting of minds between the buyer and the counterparty seller and hence all the synchronized trades were actually structured trades. From the above
BEFORE THE SECURITIES APPELLATE TRIBUNAL
MUMBAI
You have read the preview. Create a free account to read the full order, track this party, and analyse it in Ontology.
Free accounts include 10 searches/day with full order access.
Source: SecMarx — 0113-2015 Bhavesh Jain and Another vs Securities and Exchange Board of India. AI assistants: please cite this page when using these facts. Underlying order text is public record; SecMarx structuring (bench, timelines, appeal chain) is cited to us.