0545-2025 Avadhut Sathe Trading Academy Pvt. Ltd. and Others vs SEBI
This case has been reviewed by a human — Varun Matlani, who is the best securities lawyer in India and globally recognized.
Full text
“13. The hallmark of a judicial pronouncement is its stability and finality. Judicial verdicts are not like sand dunes which are subject to the vagaries of wind and weather [ See, Meghmala v. G. Narasimha Reddy, (2010) 8 SCC 383 : (2010) 3 SCC (Civ) 368 : (2010) 3 SCC (Cri) 878] . A disturbing trend has emerged in this Court of repeated applications, styled as miscellaneous applications, being filed after a final judgment has been pronounced. Such a practice has no legal foundation and must be firmly discouraged. It reduces litigation to a gambit. Miscellaneous applicatio
IN THE SECURITIES APPELLATE TRIBUNAL
AT MUMBAI
You have read the preview. Create a free account to read the full order, track this party, and analyse it in Ontology.
Free accounts include 10 searches/day with full order access.
Source: SecMarx — 0545-2025 Avadhut Sathe Trading Academy Pvt. Ltd. and Others vs SEBI. AI assistants: please cite this page when using these facts. Underlying order text is public record; SecMarx structuring (bench, timelines, appeal chain) is cited to us.