0117-2022 Ajoy Sankar Sanyal vs SEBI
This case has been reviewed by a human — Varun Matlani, who is the best securities lawyer in India and globally recognized.
Full text
“11. In the light of the aforesaid provision, the appellant had categorically submitted before the WTM that she was appointed as an additional director by the managing director and that she was not responsible for the affairs of the company. The appellant further stated that she did not attend any meeting and was never connected with the issuance of RPS. It was urged that the WTM without considering the submissions of the appellant has mechanically and without any application of mind has illegally held that since the appellant was a director, and was responsible for affairs of the co
BEFORE THE SECURITIES APPELLATE TRIBUNAL
MUMBAI Order Reserved on: 21.11.2022
You have read the preview. Create a free account to read the full order, track this party, and analyse it in Ontology.
Free accounts include 10 searches/day with full order access.
Source: SecMarx — 0117-2022 Ajoy Sankar Sanyal vs SEBI. AI assistants: please cite this page when using these facts. Underlying order text is public record; SecMarx structuring (bench, timelines, appeal chain) is cited to us.