1031-2022 D.B. Jain and Another vs SEBI
This case has been reviewed by a human — Varun Matlani, who is the best securities lawyer in India and globally recognized.
Full text
Dear Sirs, Sub : Pledge Agreement We are surprised and shocked to receive a copy of the Pledge Agreement dated 12th November 2010 said to have been executed between us, and sent by you on 10th September 2012 vide email. We wish to inform that the copy sent by you is totally different than the one signed by us. We have observed the following discrepancy in the copy sent by you. 1. The authorised person from Nakoda Ltd. Had signed each page of the Agreement, whereas his signature is not available on pages 1 to 4 in the copy sent by you. 2. The authorised person from Nakoda lt
IN THE SECURITIES APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT
MUMBAI
You have read the preview. Create a free account to read the full order, track this party, and analyse it in Ontology.
Free accounts include 10 searches/day with full order access.
Source: SecMarx — 1031-2022 D.B. Jain and Another vs SEBI. AI assistants: please cite this page when using these facts. Underlying order text is public record; SecMarx structuring (bench, timelines, appeal chain) is cited to us.