0111-2010 Subramanian R. Venkat and Another vs Securities and Exchange Board of India and Others
This case has been reviewed by a human — Varun Matlani, who is the best securities lawyer in India and globally recognized.
Full text
“a. Whether the impugned changes made in the scheme amounted to changes in the fundamental attributes of the scheme in contravention of Regulation 18(15A) of the Mutual Funds Regulations and SEBI Circular dated May 23, 2008? b. Whether the Board of Trustees and the Fund have contravened Regulations 18(9) & 18(22) and Clauses 2, 6 and 9 of the Code of Conduct prescribed under the Fifth Schedule of the Mutual Funds Regulations? c. Whether the AMC had contravened Regulations 18(9), 18(22), 25(1) & 25(16) and Clauses 2, 6 & 9 of the Code of Conduct prescribed under the Fifth Sc
BEFORE THE SECURITIES APPELLATE TRIBUNAL
MUMBAI
You have read the preview. Create a free account to read the full order, track this party, and analyse it in Ontology.
Free accounts include 10 searches/day with full order access.
Source: SecMarx — 0111-2010 Subramanian R. Venkat and Another vs Securities and Exchange Board of India and Others. AI assistants: please cite this page when using these facts. Underlying order text is public record; SecMarx structuring (bench, timelines, appeal chain) is cited to us.