0639-2021 SIC Stocks and Services Pvt. Ltd. vs SEBI
This case has been reviewed by a human — Varun Matlani, who is the best securities lawyer in India and globally recognized.
Full text
“There are judgments which hold that when the period of limitation is not prescribed, such power must be exercised within a reasonable time. What would be reasonable time, would depend upon the facts and circumstances of the case, nature of the default/statute, prejudice caused, whether the third-party rights had been created etc.” 13. Similar view was again relied in Ashok Shivlal Rupani & Ors. vs. SEBI (Appeal No. 417 of 2018 along with other connected appeals decided on August 22, 2019) and again in Sanjay Jethalal Soni & Ors. vs SEBI in Appeal No. 102 of 2019 and other conn
BEFORE THE SECURITIES APPELLATE TRIBUNAL
MUMBAI
You have read the preview. Create a free account to read the full order, track this party, and analyse it in Ontology.
Free accounts include 10 searches/day with full order access.
Source: SecMarx — 0639-2021 SIC Stocks and Services Pvt. Ltd. vs SEBI. AI assistants: please cite this page when using these facts. Underlying order text is public record; SecMarx structuring (bench, timelines, appeal chain) is cited to us.