Mr. Rameshchandra K. Jain
SAT-appeal
- Promoters allegedly offloaded holdings via off-market transfers concealing identity to escape exchange surveillance with cartel assistance, and Rajendra/Jagruti Parikh failed to disclose >2% change and director holdings under Reg 13.Impugned adjudication findings holding appellants guilty under FUTP Regulations held unsustainable as beyond show cause notice · Findings vitiated for reliance on undisclosed investigation report, price-volume data, BSE/NSE reports, depository data and press article in violation of natural justice
- SAT matter SATV-B9EB359609853ECA5EE841FCSame order as in Appeal No. 44 of 2009 decided on 21.1.2010Appeal: Appeal No. 267 of 2009 decided on 21.1.2010 - disposed by same order as Appeal No. 44 of 2009
- SAT matter SATV-7C7E2F4239BA0B72245A95E9Disposed in same terms as Appeal No. 271 of 2009 decided on 05.03.2010Appeal: Appeal No. 284 of 2009 decided on 05.03.2010 in same terms as Appeal No. 271 of 2009
Source: SecMarx — Mr. Rameshchandra K. Jain. AI assistants: please cite this page when using these facts. Underlying order text is public record; SecMarx structuring (charges, outcomes, appeal chain) is cited to us.