Vijay Suryavanshi
SAT-appeal
- Penalty for violation of SEBI laws per AO orders (specific violation not detailed in SAT order)Condonation of delay applications (Misc. App. 49-51/2021, 89-91/2020) rejected · Appeal Nos. 72, 73, 74 of 2020 dismissed with no order as to costsAppeal: Appeal Nos. 72, 73 and 74 of 2020 dismissed on 18.02.2021 for inordinate delay of 3579 days
- SAT matter SATV-88F2627B3834679F255B94D7Applications for condonation of 3579 days delay rejected · Appeal Nos. 72, 73 and 74 of 2020 dismissed with no order as to costsAppeal: Appeal Nos. 72, 73 and 74 of 2020 dismissed on 18.02.2021 for inordinate 3579 days delay
- Violation of SEBI laws leading to AO penalty orders (specific provisions not detailed in SAT order)Applications for condonation of 3579 days delay rejected · Appeal Nos. 72, 73 and 74 of 2020 dismissed with no order as to costsAppeal: Appeal Nos. 72, 73, 74 of 2020 dismissed on 18.02.2021; Misc. Applications 49-51/2021 and 89-91/2020 for condonation rejected
- SAT matter SATV-FC90B8161615063D1D1C8677Listed on February 18, 2021 for further hearing · Interim order, if any, extended till next date of hearingAppeal: Appeal Nos. 72, 73 and 74 of 2020 with Misc. Applications 49-51 of 2021 and 89-91 of 2020 pending; interim order extended till 18.02.2021
Source: SecMarx — Vijay Suryavanshi. AI assistants: please cite this page when using these facts. Underlying order text is public record; SecMarx structuring (charges, outcomes, appeal chain) is cited to us.