Mrs. Ipsita Das Giri
Penalties and directions recorded
- Parties were directed to obtain instructions from the Registrar 48 hours before the hearing regarding video conference or physical hearing
- WTM refund direction of Rs. 1,75,00,000 upheld
- Parties to take instructions from Registrar 48 hours before fixed date on video vs physical hearing
- Parties to take instructions from Registrar 48 hours before date fixed on video conference vs physical hearing mode
- Parties to take instructions from Registrar 48 hours before fixed date on hearing mode
SAT-appeal
- SAT matter SATV-2163668CECBF48F6BD687858Appeals and delay applications were directed to be listed on 19 April 2021 · Parties were directed to obtain instructions from the Registrar 48 hours before the hearing regarding video conference or physical hearingAppeal: Appeal Nos. 315, 316 and 317 of 2020 were pending and directed to be listed on 19 April 2021; no disposal on merits stated
- SAT matter SATV-35DCE68D9BADF36B31E4712ADelay in filing Appeal No. 317 of 2020 condoned · SEBI directed to file its reply within three weeksAppeal: Misc. Application No. 325 of 2020 allowed; delay condoned in Appeal No. 317 of 2020. Appeal not finally disposed of and listed for 21 June 2021.
- Offer and allotment of shares by URO Autotech Limited in violation of Section 73(2) of Companies Act, 1956 (deemed public issue requiring refund).Appeal No. 317 of 2020 dismissed with no order as to costs · WTM refund direction of Rs. 1,75,00,000 upheldAppeal: Appeal No. 317 of 2020 dismissed on 09.08.2021 (reserved on 04.08.2021)
- SAT matter SATV-400F0322BC7850B031EDF412Put up Appeal Nos. 315-317 of 2020 on April 19, 2021 · Parties to take instructions from Registrar 48 hours before fixed date on video vs physical hearingAppeal: Appeal Nos. 315, 316, 317 of 2020 with Misc. Applications Nos. 323, 324, 325 of 2020 (Delay) pending; adjourned to April 19, 2021
- SAT matter SATV-5560F16F947929E23BDD90C9Put up Appeal Nos. 315, 316 and 317 of 2020 on April 19, 2021 · Parties to take instructions from Registrar 48 hours before date fixed on video conference vs physical hearing modeAppeal: Appeal Nos. 315, 316 and 317 of 2020 with Misc. Applications Nos. 323, 324 and 325 of 2020 (Delay Applications) pending; adjourned to April 19, 2021
- SAT matter SATV-47367C26915E9E15BBB98856Heard in part; matter put up on August 04, 2021 for further hearing · Parties to act on digitally signed copy sent by fax and/or emailAppeal: Appeal No. 317 of 2020 heard in part on 03.08.2021, adjourned to 04.08.2021 for further hearing
- SAT matter SATV-5E1B76CF1E8E9F3A31271C42Respondent to file reply in Misc. Applications Nos. 323 and 324 of 2020 within three weeks · Appellant to file rejoinder within two weeks thereafterAppeal: Appeal Nos. 315, 316 and 317 of 2020 with Misc. Applications 323, 324 and 325 of 2020 for delay condonation pending; replies in 323-324 awaited, listed 20 Jan 2021
- SAT matter SATV-39EA3175317E35A218714CE0Respondent granted three weeks to file replies in Misc. Applications Nos. 323 and 324 of 2020 · Appellant granted two weeks thereafter to file rejoinderAppeal: Appeal Nos. 315, 316 and 317 of 2020 were pending; associated delay applications were adjourned for replies and final disposal on 20 January 2021
- Illegal collection of money in violation of Companies Act, 1956 leading to WTM refund direction.Misc Application No. 324 of 2020 for condonation of delay rejected · Appeal No. 316 of 2020 dismissed consequentially with no order as to costsAppeal: Appeal No. 316 of 2020 with Misc Application No. 324 of 2020 dismissed on 19.04.2021 for 1004 days delay
- SAT matter SATV-A0CE31FB74565155A59F0548Appeals adjourned on respondent counsel's prayer for adjournment · List on April 16, 2021Appeal: Appeal Nos. 315, 316 and 317 of 2020 with Misc. Applications 323, 324, 325 of 2020 (Delay Applications) adjourned, not disposed; next date April 16, 2021
- SAT matter SATV-AAC73BFAEB53B17483C452DAAppeals adjourned on respondent's request for adjournment · List on April 16, 2021Appeal: Appeal Nos. 315, 316 and 317 of 2020 with Misc. Applications Nos. 323, 324 and 325 of 2020 (delay) pending; adjourned to April 16, 2021
- Illegal collection of money in violation of Companies Act, 1956 leading to WTM direction to refund money collectedApplication for condonation of 1199 days delay rejected - no sufficient cause shown · Appeal No. 315 of 2020 dismissed with no order as to costsAppeal: Appeal No. 315 of 2020 with Misc. Application No. 323 of 2020 dismissed on 19.04.2021 for 1199 days delay
- SAT matter SATV-4FF979CE996F2DD779BCF580Respondent granted three weeks to file replies in Misc. Application Nos. 323 and 324 of 2020 · Appellant granted two weeks thereafter to file rejoinderAppeal: Appeal Nos. 315, 316 and 317 of 2020 were pending; associated delay applications were listed for final disposal on 20 January 2021
- SAT matter SATV-8D40F5B7B8A367AECC77E9E8Appeals adjourned on respondent's prayer for adjournment · Parties directed to take instructions from Registrar 48 hours before fixed date on hearing modeAppeal: Appeal Nos. 315, 316, 317 of 2020 with Misc. Applications Nos. 323, 324, 325 of 2020 (Delay Applications) - adjourned, listed on April 16, 2021
- SAT matter SATV-7B55B09082B22A699DD68E2BMisc. Application No. 1007 of 2021 rejected - no manifest error in order dated August 9, 2021Appeal: Misc. Application No. 1007 of 2021 in Appeal No. 317 of 2020 seeking rectification of SAT order dated 09.08.2021 rejected on 27.09.2021
- SAT matter SATV-9A6B64DF17E5D1A1F0CED721Order reserved after hearing learned counsel for parties through video conference · Parties directed to act on digitally signed copy sent by fax and/or emailAppeal: Appeal No. 317 of 2020 heard on 04.08.2021; order reserved, no final disposal in this order
- SAT matter SATV-B2C77F4088DC41812D1951D6Matter adjourned due to demise of arguing counsel · Listed on August 3, 2021Appeal: Appeal No. 317 of 2020 pending before SAT; adjourned on 21.06.2021 to August 3, 2021
Source: SecMarx — Mrs. Ipsita Das Giri. AI assistants: please cite this page when using these facts. Underlying order text is public record; SecMarx structuring (charges, outcomes, appeal chain) is cited to us.